Disclosure first: I build Simplepages, which is one of the seven tools below, so this is a vendor's comparison rather than a neutral lab test. I have tried to be fair to the competition and honest about where ours falls short, but read it with that bias in mind. The reason I can write it at all is that a lot of agencies run client pages on Simplepages, so I spend my time close to how this work actually goes: shipping the tenth client page of the month, on a deadline, for a client who wants a fourth round of changes, expects to review the work under the agency's brand, and needs the page to collect payments.
So instead of scoring demos, I ranked seven AI landing page builders on the parts of agency work that actually cost time and money, and I explain each score as I go.
The four tests that matter for agency work
Any builder can make a good page in a demo. Agency economics turn on four things that a demo never shows, so those are what I scored.
- White-label support. Whether the client-facing surfaces (preview links, lead notification emails, a client portal) carry your brand instead of the vendor's. A tool badge on a page you are charging for undercuts the whole pitch.
- Client billing and payments. Two questions in one: whether client pages can collect money through checkout or high-converting forms, and whether you can keep each client separated without a fresh account and card per project.
- Unlimited AI edits. Good pages are iterated into shape over many small changes, and a lot of those changes now go through the AI. Most tools let you edit manually without limits, but meter the AI itself with credits or a monthly quota. On a busy roster, what matters is whether the AI edits are unlimited, so the fortieth prompt costs what the first one did.
- AI edit precision. The real measure of an AI editor is whether it can change one thing and leave the rest alone. You want to swap a headline, replace one image, or tighten spacing without the tool rearranging the page around it.
Speed and design quality matter as well, but every tool here clears that bar. The four tests above are where they separate.
The scorecard
The ratings below are my read on each tool for agency use, based on how each one is built and what it charges for, not a hands-on lab test of all seven. I build one of them, so weigh that accordingly. "Strong" means it is a real reason to choose the tool. "Limited" or "None" means you will feel the gap on client work. "Metered" in the AI-edits column means manual editing is unlimited but AI usage runs on credits or a quota. Plans and limits change often, so confirm the current details on each vendor's site before you commit. The rows run in the same order as the write-up that follows, from the weakest fit for agency landing pages to the strongest.
| Tool | White-label | Client billing & payments | Unlimited AI edits | AI edit precision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lovable | None | Limited | Metered | Coarse |
| Unicorn Platform | Limited | Limited | Metered | Partial |
| LanderLab | Partial | Partial | Metered | Limited |
| Landingi | Good | Partial | Metered | Limited |
| Dorik | Good | Partial | Metered | Partial |
| Framer AI | Good | Partial | Metered | Manual-first |
| Simplepages | Strong | Strong | Unlimited | Strong |
All seven are capable products. What separates them here is how much of the agency-specific job each one was built to do, so the sections below go worst-to-best fit for that job.
7. Lovable
Lovable is the most technically impressive tool on this list and, in my view, the least suited to agency landing pages. You describe an app and it scaffolds a working full-stack React project. For a marketing page, that architecture is the problem rather than the payoff: you inherit a real codebase, and the AI makes changes by regenerating code, so a small edit can ripple into layout or logic elsewhere on the page.
It also has none of the agency layer that this comparison scores. There is no client portal, no branded preview link to send for sign-off, and no white-label lead emails, so anything client-facing runs through your own accounts and hand-offs. Pricing is based on credits and messages, which turns the many small revisions client work needs into a metered cost. Lovable is a strong choice for prototyping software with real logins and data, and getting a codebase out is a feature there. A landing page is a different deliverable. I made the longer case in why Lovable is not ideal for building websites, and there is a full Simplepages vs Lovable breakdown as well.
6. Unicorn Platform
Unicorn Platform is a block-based builder with an AI assistant, aimed at a founder shipping a single startup landing page. For that user it is pleasant to work in, and manual editing is unlimited. For agency use it runs thin fairly quickly. You can publish to a client's domain, but there is no client portal and no branded lead notification emails, so the account juggling and brand hiding are left to you. The AI leans toward drafting copy more than editing with precision, and its generations run on a quota rather than being unlimited. Support for taking payments or managing separate clients is basic. You can build client pages on it, but you will be supplying the agency scaffolding yourself.
5. LanderLab
LanderLab comes out of the paid-traffic world, so it is good at what performance marketers need: fast pages, custom domains, and your own tracking wired in. Manual editing is unlimited, and you get some white-label control over domains, which helps when you run client campaigns. Two gaps show up on retainer work. The AI leans toward assisting with copy rather than building and revising a page with precision, and its AI help is metered rather than unlimited. The client operations are also light: there is no polished client portal or per-client reporting, so the admin load grows as the roster does.
4. Landingi
Landingi is one of the few tools here that was designed with agencies in mind. Its higher tiers include real white-label and sub-account features, so you can give clients access under your brand and keep each account separated. That is a real advantage, and it is why Landingi sits mid-table despite being the least AI-native option on the list.
The trade-off is where the intelligence sits. Landingi is a mature template-and-editor platform with AI added on for copy and images, rather than an AI-first builder that generates and revises a whole page from a prompt. You can edit manually as much as you want, and the AI features run on credits, though most of the work is manual anyway. If you prefer to drive the layout yourself and mainly want the agency plumbing, Landingi is a reasonable pick. If you are buying the AI to do the first draft and most of the edits, it does less of that than the newer tools.
3. Dorik
Dorik is the best-rounded of the established tools for agency use. It pairs an AI website generator with a clean visual editor and unlimited manual edits, and it offers white-label and reseller options that let you run client work under your brand and even resell the platform itself. For a studio that wants one tool covering both AI generation and client management, Dorik is a solid answer, and the strongest all-rounder here after Simplepages.
Where it stops short of the top is precision, AI limits, and the last stretch of client operations. The AI generates well and revises acceptably, but exact single-element edits still fall back to the manual editor, and AI generations are metered by plan rather than unlimited. The client-facing polish (branded approval previews, per-client reports, brand kits kept on file) is also less tightly integrated than a purpose-built agency plan. Dorik is the strong generalist, and the final tests are where a specialist pulls ahead.
2. Framer AI
Framer sets the design ceiling on this list. If your agency competes on visual craft, nothing here gives you the same control, and the AI is a useful way to rough out a first draft. You can remove Framer branding on paid plans and publish to client domains, so the white-label basics are covered, and manual editing is unlimited.
Two things keep it at number two for this particular job. It is manual-first: the AI starts the page, but the craft and the client revision cycle are you working in the editor, which is powerful and slower than a prompt-and-refine loop, and the AI usage itself is metered. And it is a design tool rather than a client-operations tool, so there is no built-in client portal, per-client reporting, or reseller billing, and the multi-client admin falls to you. Framer is the right call when the page itself is the product and you are happy to own the operations around it.
1. Simplepages
Bias alert again, since Simplepages is mine: discount the ranking accordingly. I put it first because it is the only tool here built around these four tests from the start, not bolted on later.
- White-label everywhere the client looks. Preview links, lead notification emails, and the client portal all carry your brand, not ours, so the client never sees Simplepages.
- Client billing and payments. Client pages take payments through built-in checkout with 0% commission from us, and per-client reports plus brand kits keep each account separated without a new login per client.
- Unlimited AI edits. AI generation, image generation, and AI edits are unlimited, with no credits to ration across a roster, so the fortieth revision costs what the first one did. This is the clearest gap between us and the metered tools above.
- Precise AI edits. Pages are fast, clean HTML rather than a regenerated app, so the AI can change one headline or swap one image and leave the rest untouched. When you want pixel-level control, the visual editor is right there.
The Agency plan packages this for a real client roster: 50 live landing pages, 15 multi-page sites, 10 team seats, and everything above, for $149 a month. One subscription covers the whole roster, with no per-client fees and no AI usage meters.
The AI gets you a first draft in minutes. Your team makes the calls that actually need taste, and the client only ever sees a preview with your logo on it.
The honest limits: Simplepages is shaped for landing pages and websites, not general software. If your deliverable has logins, dashboards, and application logic, use Lovable and keep the codebase. The plan caps at 50 pages and 15 sites, so a very large agency may outgrow a single workspace, and it is a younger product than Landingi or Framer. For the specific job of running a roster of client landing pages that load fast, rank, convert, and stay on your brand, that focus is the advantage.
So which one should you pick?
The right pick depends on what you are actually handing over. If it is software with logins and data, that is Lovable, and honestly not a landing page tool at all. A single flagship page where the design is the whole point goes to Framer. Want one tool that handles AI generation and client management without much fuss? Dorik is the generalist to beat. Landingi if you would rather drive the layout yourself and just want the agency plumbing around it. And if the job is a roster of client pages you build fast, edit with the AI as much as you want, and run under your own brand with payments built in, that is where Simplepages fits.
Since I build one of these, do not take my word for the ranking. The Agency plan page has the full walkthrough of ours, and the announcement post covers why we built it. The most reliable way to judge any of these, ours included, is to build one real client page on each and see how often the tool gets in your way.